Two alcohol-related proposals have been floating around The Sun’s opinion pages in recent weeks that, while entirely different in nature, deserve to be unconventionally paired: Like a crisp rosé wine with an aged Gouda, they can make each other better. The first would raise the statewide sales tax on alcohol for 9% to 10%. The second would allow chain stores to sell alcoholic beverages so that you could not only buy your dinner at Safeway, you could pick up a six-pack to go with it. The former is likely to reduce sales of wine, beer and liquor; the second to potentially expand them. But it’s actually quite a bit more complicated than that and, fortunately, the implications are almost entirely positive.
Let’s start with some perspective. First, Maryland is not now an especially high alcohol tax state. A 2018 survey by the Tax Foundation ranked Maryland 31st among the 50 states in taxes on distilled spirits. The ranking on wine and beer taxes is higher (just in the top quintile) but still less than many southern states. But what Maryland does have is significant evidence of alcohol and drug abuse. Drug- and alcohol-related deaths increased 9% in the first half of this year; the coronavirus apparently contributing to the problem. Opioids represent the biggest share of that but don’t discount alcohol. Surveys suggest both sales and consumption are up substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic and with them all the associated risks — impaired driving, domestic abuse, underage drinking and on and on.
Meanwhile, Maryland is going to need at least two things if the economy is going to continue to recover. It’s going to have to address projected state budget deficits in the next two fiscal years, and it’s going to need to help boost the struggling retail economy. Some would prefer to solve the budget shortfall through cuts in services alone but given voter attachment to K-12 public education spending, that’s unlikely to pair well with school systems that are already struggling to meet student needs with online learning. Are they going to layoff teachers next year? Cut salaries? Increase classroom sizes? Delaying Kirwan’s boost to education is one thing, starving students just when they need the support most is another.
The final piece to this puzzle is the opportunity presented by expanded liquor sales. Obviously, this would loosen the headlock that liquor stores have on alcohol sales in much of the state, but disrupting that monopoly is a good thing. Not only would it be convenient for consumers, but the companies that stand to benefit from this deregulation have already promised to hire hundreds more workers. And it might even help Baltimore attract grocery stores to its food desserts while simultaneously starving those corner liquor stores that tend to attract crime. That would be a well-deserved win-win for the city.
Admittedly, this might be a bit much to ask of what amounts to some modest tinkering with Maryland’s rather convoluted liquor laws. And it won’t net